ALLAH guides the decoding process, and proofreads. If I make a mistake in the decoding process, ALLAH informs me. For example, I was decoding July 28, 2023.
DECODING: JULY TWENTY EIGHTH TWO THOUSAND TWENTY THREE
I felt the tweet contained "YAHWEH TTY OWL TOE", which meant ALLAH was transmitting wisdom to the person with the handle "Toe." I was looking for my GOD's next word when the word Jung (as in Carl Jung) caught my attention, so I plugged "Jung" into my anagram to see what words remained:
"YAHWEH TTY JUNG OWL TOE"
but the remaining words expressed ALLAH saying "NO, 'Jung' is not the right word, ALLAH tease, ALLAH is uninterested in conveying Jung's wisdom to Toe, which obviously there is no wisdom outside of GOD's.
DECODING: JULY TWENTY EIGHTH TWO THOUSAND TWENTY THREE
ANAGRAM: YAHWEH TTY JUNG OWL TOE TTT YHWH UNINTERESTED
SOUNDEX: YAHWEH TTY JUNG OWL TOE TEASE YHWH UNINTERESTED
The correct anagram is below:
DECODING: JULY TWENTY EIGHTH TWO THOUSAND TWENTY THREE
ANAGRAM: YAHWEH TTY T OWL NUN RETWEETS TOE JD HIT THY GUN
SOUNDEX: YAHWEH TTY TEE OWL NUN RETWEETS TOE JD HIT THY GUN
ALLAH says HE ends His wisdom at the soundex level. So I stop at the Soundex, leaving the translation or interpretation of the message, to the message recipient. See Pseudochat™ User Manual, for translation methods encountered, while decoding using Eve's Lens™. - Deirdre Rose
ALLAH is conducting a study on social order greed. I, Deirdre Rose, ALLAH's aide, participate in GOD's study; I take notes, record my observations, form and test hypotheses. GOD has also tasked me with decoding Holy Bible Book of Revelation and proving GOD's Existence scientifically. To accomplish these goals, the population under study is objects: people, places and things. Population size in terms of people is ~8.1 billion as of Year 2023. The sample under study is America's Secret Industry; sample size in terms of people is greater than 1 million. Our sample is studied in clusters of variable size.
America's Secret Industry ("Omerta") is a covert international industry where negroes in America are hunted for game. The goal of the industry is varied: The Klan's goal is to use exotic immigrants as honeypots to trap negro men, alter America's composition and reinstitute a slave population. China's goal is the export of negroes for human meat to eat. U.S. Navy Fleet and American Medical Association's goal is the decriminalization and commercialization of hunting, killing, exporting negroes for medical research purposes and profit. Another goal is to grow an army in United States loyal to Xi Jinping.
America's Secret Industry goals are achieved by soliciting international prostitutes to stow away on U.S. Navy Fleet and come to America as an indentured servant, to offer erotic entertainment and fulfill orders for "LOVE" as a line item on a grant or GSA Schedule, a contract used by United States to procure goods and services for the Federal Government. LOVE is a shortname for "LOVEVONIA FORD BERRY." Indentured servants coming to work for Lovevonia Ford Berry, also known as Ann Berry Rose are issued false documents by an Omerta Judge which enables them to receive a temporary work visa employer identification numbers ("EIN") Fulfilling an order for "LOVE" is the EIN's path to U. S. citizenship. Orders for "LOVE" entail Ann's coven identifying and ambushing a couple in love forcing the man to choose between dying or marrying the EIN prostitute. If the man chooses to marry the prostitute, he is made a pet bridegroom; and the female he was with is drugged and murdered in a death match. If the man does not agree to marry the EIN prostitute, the man and his sweetheart are both killed. Pet Bridegrooms, EIN, their eggs,sperm and embryos are placed in real estate investment trust (REIT) and traded on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and NASDAQ. This is how the EIN obtains an American identity and social security number; she assumes the identity of the male's murdered sweetheart or she trades the identity for another murdered person's identity. An EIN accumulates wealth and power based on the number of missions they successfully complete. As depicted on the mob relationship diagram, Ann Berry Rose has risen from a stow away EIN prostitute to Xi Jinping's proxy and hub of America's Secret Industry operations.
Thus far, I have concluded that what makes hunting humans in America successful are:
1) Predators Receive Government Funding & Cash Advances.
2) Predators Receive State & Local Government Logistical Assistance & Police Backup.
3) Prey Is an unsuspecting public; people behind America's Secret Industry occupy public trust and trusted positions. Human headhunters include cops, firemen, paramedics, nurses, pharmacist, doctors, lawyers, judges, legialators, elected and appointed officials, government employees; spouses, loved interests, and trusted friends who for one reason or another betray the victim.
5)Element of surprise.
6)Victim behaves as expected (psychological): fear of death, fear of harm to family or fear of loss of property (e.g. threats of arson against home).
7)Victim behaves as expected (physical): fight or flight.
8) Hunters use darts to drug victims disabling them or injections of deadly toxins or disease. A victim aware they have been injected with a deadly toxin are easier to coerce.
9 EINs and their targets are placed in real estate investment trust (REIT) and are traded on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or NASDAQ, which helps maintain a market for selling humans, embryos, eggs, sperm, human organs and body parts.
10) Unwitting American taxpayers, via kleptocrats, finance the negro hunting game. Meaning, though negroes are the primary targets hunted, all of America is dying because America's Secret Industry eating up America's resources.
America’s Secret industry started as an aggressive overt threat from China that resulted in an illicit memorandum of understanding between Confederates in Congress, United States Navy, and the Chinese Communist Party, whereby to avoid war with China, America agreed to look the other way (“Omertà”), while the confederacy – still in existence— hunt, trap, and export negro men to supply China with dark human meat to eat for China’s cannibals. However, over generations, American Kleptocrats emerged, and profiteers grew America’s Secret Industry into an International Crime Syndicate, (“Mafia Cult,” “Mob”) currently headed by Xi Jinping and Xi’s Prefect, U.S. District Judge Analisa Nadine Torres. The primary targets of Omertà are still negro men; but the pool of available dark meat does not meet demand, so Torres industrialized human meat by ancestry. Torres has also developed a pipeline of human crop, fertilized human eggs (zygotes), by creating and industrializing a system called Pet Bridegroom Romance (PBR).
Pet Bridegroom Romance (PBR) is coerced or forced “romance” between a negro male captured by the Mob and a mafia sex worker that results in a marriage ceremony. In addition to PBR being used to produce human crop for sale, it also serves as incentive for mafia sex workers. Sex workers obtain a pet bridegroom by bidding on the male captive, the successful bidder is required to murder the captive’s wife, girlfriend, or sweetheart, in order to help cultivate pet bridegroom. Marriage is the means by which Omertà controls the slave; the captive’s marriage oath is an oral chain. Marriage helps disguise the fact that the male has been taken captive a slave. Elopement is usually given as the reason a man disappears and reappears with a woman unknown to his family by his side. Marriage also makes it easier to transport resisting slaves. If the slave attempts to escape, the attempt is couched as domestic violence, providing cover for Omertà law enforcement to arrest and discipline the slave without anyone questioning.
PBR households are allotted children, who are also owned by Omertà. In the event a slave does escape, he can be located under the guise that the slave owes a child support debt.
An alternate scenario, which was the case in Uvalde Texas, is to murder or injure the captive’s family and make it appear that the target is the perpetrator, thereby justifying law enforcement taking the target into custody or killing the target in plain sight under the guise that the captive was a public threat. The criteria for targeting pet bridegrooms are that he be retainable, that is he is coercible by the Mob. Pet bridegroom candidates that cannot be coerced are murdered by the mob.
Pet bridegroom targets are typically travelers, strangers, homeless or transients— individuals who won’t be missed or whose families don’t have resources to make a big fuss if their loved one goes missing. Couples are also targeted as Omertà has concluded that men in relationships provide a better return on investment as they are easier to acclimate to the PBR household arrangement after their real family is murdered.
Fake shelters, fake churches, fake free clinics, fake charities, fake vacation resorts have also been established by the Mob to help trap people. Targets are marked, tailed, lured by sex, and trapped. Trapping usually involves tranquilizer darts so the victim can’t fight or escape; or darts filled with heroin so that the victim can be transported, without question, to the Mob’s cooperating Hospital Emergency Rooms under the guise that the person injected themselves and overdosed; overdose is also a typical reason given for an Omertà induced death.
Once in custody of America’s Secret Industry: Cooperating Hospitals, Law Enforcement Detention Centers, Prisons, School Dorms (“Omerta”), captives who are not butchered and used as cannibal food, are forced to stud, and produce zygotes, which are developed for food and exported around the world, or they are exported for illicit medical research. Kiev, Ukraine is a primary destination for targets used in illicit medical research. The primary targets of these exports, again, are negro descendants of African slaves, but thanks to United States District Court Judge Analisa Nadine Torres, other ancestries have been industrialized.
In cases where families do make a fuss, Torres has industrialized an entire apparatus to quell and or eliminate family opposition while still making a profit for Xi Jinping’s Mob. Omertà’s clean-up operation involves the target’s family being murdered via pay-per-view death match and cannibalized. Deceased family members’ social security numbers and identities, and even their jobs, are sold to people desiring to migrate to America who already work for Omertà or are willing to work for Xi Jinping’s syndicate.
America’s Secret Industry is funded by Kleptocrats in Congress via Earmarks under which job order numbers (JONs)are established for Xi Jinping. Omertà Clean-up Operation JONs are currently allocated by Merrick Garland, Attorney General of United States. Before Garland became Attorney General, He was Omertà and he still is The President of the United States signs off on the appropriations. However, Former President Donald Trump could not be herded by America’s Secret Industry, so then President Donald Trump became a target of America’s Secret Industry’s attacks. The choreographed insurrection on January 6th was paid for by Xi Jinping.
BRIEF HISTORY OF AMERICA’S SECRET INDUSTRY
The confederates lost the war, but they did not stop fighting, they joined forces with Chinese Communist Party and defected but remained on American soil securing positions of public trust from which they and their descendants could spy on America for China and divert America’s resources to China for American Kleptocrats to absorb. The confederates set up shop in the judicial branch of government, taught their kids to hate and disguise hate, and from there they spread. Generations later, Xi Jinping General Secretary of Chinese Communist party heads a sophisticated international crime syndicate comprised of rogue members of congress, judiciary, bar, and others occupying positions of public trust in America; funded by earmarks.” Many sitting on the bench, in police and sheriffs’ offices and other positions of public trust are Omerta, and a supermajority in congress are kleptocrats and spies.
August 18, 2023
I began investigating this case on or about July 16, 2023, upon the LORD's instruction to decode and chronicle Carlethia "Carlee" Nichole Russell. I initially classified the case as a WHODUNNIT? because the data indicated Carlee was dead, yet the data caused me to have more questions than answers. I wanted to know: who killed Carlee and why a Carlee impersonator returned to the Russell home? Why, with the exception of the boyfriend - Thomar, Carlee's family was going along with the masquerade that the imposter was Carlee. Thomar was going along with the masquerade that the impersonator was Carlee, but Thomar described himself now as the "ex-boyfriend" of Carlee, which to me seemed peremptory, in that Thomar agreed to pretend the impersonater was his girlfriend Carlee, but either the impersonator or Thomar himself was drawing a line at fulfilling what is typically expected of a boyfriend/girlfriend: public displays of affection and sexual intimacy, which is discernable through body language.
ALLAH has since confirmed that this case is a WHODUNNIT? But it's Rutha Mae Glascoe's WHODUNNIT? ALLAH confirmed Carlee is dead, Carlee
is testifying at the Judgment Seat of Christ regarding her role in my mother's murder. Rutha Mae Glascoe is my mother, I did not even
know my mother - now dead `12 years - had been murdered. I last saw my mother when I dropped her off at home after she was discharged
over my objection from an emergency room in Manasses, Virginia, where my brother and I had taken her for a second opinion.
My mother had unexplainable illness for several months. My sisters I had gone on vacation in ~July 2011, my mother was fine when we left.
Shortly after our return, my mother began to go into deep sleeps and could not be awakened. She had diabetes, so we thought it was related.
However, the emergency doctors at Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center, in Woodbridge, Virginia, said they did not know what
was wrong with her. My mother's primary care physician, Dr. Atul Kapadia, who my mother liked and trusted, said he could not find the cause of
my mothers illness, which, as my mothers legal health care representative, prompted me to take my mother to another hospital for 2nd opinon,
when, while talking to one nurse, another nurse discharged my mother. I went back to my mothers room, and a nurse, speaking in sign language
to my brother, was telling him to take my mother home; the nurse had given my mother discharge papers.
So, I last saw my mother alive, was that night we drove back home. I never argued with my My mother, I had great love and respect for my mother, and she was very supportive of me, she was my best friend. But for some reason, when we drove up in front of her house, the last night I saw her alive, she started arguing, and exhausted, I argued back. I don't even remember what the argument was about. But I called my sister and told her to check in o my mother because I needed a break, we had been running back and forth to the hospital with no anwers. ~A day and a half, after I last saw my mother, I drove up in front of my sisters house, and as I was getting out the car, I felt a sensation at my navel. It felt like I still had an umbilical cord, and the cord was ripped out of me, the sensation was so startling that I grabbed my stomach. Shortly after I entered my sister's house the Sentara Potomac Hospital called my sister, my sister handed me the phone. The hospital said my mother was on life support and they didn't think she would make it. I went to the hospital immediately. When I arrived, my mother's bed was tilted with her feet higher than her head, and I noticed multiple bloody sneakerprints around her bed. My mother, lying, looking peaceful, looked to me to be already dead. I asked the doctor what happened and why I had not been called. He said, he was doing a risky investigative procedure, which resulted in my mother loosing a lot of blood. I informed him, he was NOT authorized to do any procedures, especially a risky one, that I never would have agreed, without 2nd or 3rd opinions and discussing pros and cons with my mother. He said, my mother was aware of the risk and had signed a consent form. He showed me the consent my mother allegedly signed. It did look like her signature, but it was very shaky. I asked the doctor if my mother was wearing glasses at the time she allegedly signed the form. He said "no." I said my mother required reading glasses to read, how then could she know the risk of the procedure, when she's ill AND she cannot see sufficiently to read the consent form. I asked if you needed consent, why did you not contact me, for that matter why did you not contact me when my mother was admitted? Does not this hospital honor health care authorizations? I think I told him that he deprived me of my right to make health care decisions I thought were best for my mother. I think he tried to appease by telling me my mother needed a blood transfusion and he needed my consent. I ask why she needed a blood tranfusion, he said because she lost alot of blood and required blood. I think he also said her vital signs were not improving, and that when he flashed his little flash light at her pupils, there was no response, when there should have been indicating she was brain dead. I consented to the blood tranfusion, but had already made up my mind to file a complaint against the doctor and hospital. After the alleged transfusion, the doctor kept pestering me to take my mother off life support, saying there was no change in her vitals. I asked, if it were your mother would you take her off life support? He said, yes, he would. I said, I wouldn't, not until, I have a chance to get a second opinion so I persistently refused. I was looking into getting a second opinion, when I was denied too. The doctor appeared irritated, and I believe I heard him suck his teeth as though to say "fuck it! he's going to do what he wants to do." The doctor entered my mother's room and sounded a code-blue. A bunch of doctors and nurses ran into the room telling me I could stay in the hall, but the rest of the family had to leave, go back to the waiting room.
I heard what sounded like someone doing chest compressions on something hollow, because I could hear them count, and then what sounded like air escaping. I think it was like someone blowing air out their mouth while saying "whoo" "whoo""whoo." Then, they said, she was dead, and a nuse brought my mother's jacket and shoes out the room, and held them out to me. And I remember staring at my mother's empty jacket - her not in it. By this time they let my siblings back in, and when my disabled brother heard of our mother's death, he let out a howl, that was might have been heard on the entire floor and then he sobbed and was calling out "Mama!, Mama!, Mama!" Then they told us we had to leave.
So I concluded my mother's death was the result of medical malpractice at Sentara Northern Virginia Medical Center For Medical Care. I commenced a grievance, and started the legwork for a lawsuit. About a year and a half after my mother's death, my GOD told me to stop everything I was doing, He had other work for me to do.
Its been almost 12 years since my mother's death, I am just finding out, an intercontinental organization ordered a HIT on my mother and a government earmark job order number (JON) was used to pay a coven to murder her. Carlethia "Carlee" Nichole Russell, a teenager at the time, was a member of the coven that. From the data I have decoded thus far, Carlee's job was to act like she was a doctor in a snuff film, where the unwitting patient, my mother, Rutha Mae Glascoe gets snuffed for the purpose of entertaining Associate Justice Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr, U.S Navy Commanders, CIA, SEC officials and others.
I also see from the data that Ann Berry Rose and her coven, beat, razored and chanted demon stuff over my mother because Ann is jealous of me and has wanted to kill me for decades. ALLAH says Ann was craving that I walk in the room while she was carving on my mother. More than 30 years ago, I was betrothed to Timothy ("Tim") Gregory Rose. Tim was my first love, and I his. Very shortly after we started dating, Tim told me He asked GOD to make me His wife, and told GOD that He, Tim, would do anything for GOD if GOD made me His wife. Tim asked me to marry Him and I said yes. However, about two years later, though we were living together and I had gone out and bought silverware engraved with "R" because I fully intended, to take on Tim's last name Rose, Tim and I had not yet had a wedding ceremony. Honestly, I was not yet ready for marriage. I wanted to go to school, and I still wanted to mess around with other guys; though I had no intention of letting Tim go. I still loved Tim. I was ready to give in to Tim's ultimatum that I either marry him or he was going to find someone else to marry. I was ready to tell Tim that I would go ahead with our wedding (only because I didn't want him to marry someone else, when an Angel appeared in the mirror and counseled me. The Angel caused me to realize I was not being fair to Tim. The Angel asked me if I loved Tim. I said, "Yes." The Angel said, "If you love Tim let Him go," so, I let Tim go. I told Tim, I couldn't marry him, and Tim moved out.
I regret letting Tim go because it resulted in Tim being captured and violently murdered by Ann, it resulted in my mother being violently murdered by Ann and her cartel, it resulted in my son Teejay, being enslaved as a pet bridegroom.
After Tim moved out, Tim hitchiked to Jacksonville, Florida to get away from me, hoping His move would cause me to change my mind about getting married. While in Florida, Tim and Ann's paths crossed and Ann set her sights on Tim. Ann became infatuated with Tim, though Tim was about six years Ann's junior. According to ALLAH's testimony, Ann tried to use sex to win Tim over, but when Tim rejected Ann, Tim was jumped by five cartel police, Tim was tied and Ann injected Tim with drugs. According to ALLAH, Tim started calling out my name "DEE! DEE! I LOVE DEE!" and Ann put a hatchet in Tim's chest. Tim's van was pushed in a lake with Tim in it. ALLAH said He commanded Ann dive in and retrieve Tim's body. ALLAH says Tim was taken to a cartel hospital, where Tim was pronounced dead. ALLAH said after Tim was pronounced dead, ALLAH heard Ann and her cartel say, they were going to come to New York and murder me, So ALLAH restarted Tim's body with a new occupant Teejay, Tim's understudy, Tim and my Son, King Jesus Christ III. ALLAH says when Ann saw Teejay, Ann ordered the cartel cops to arrest Teejay. Teejay was handcuffed to the hospital bed. Ann informed Teejay, that He was Ann's property now that "Tee" as she calls him was going to be her cover. Teejay was jailed. ALLAH says He allowed Teejay to be coerced into marrying Ann, because otherwise Ann's cartel was going to kill me.
So, all these years Ann has been jealous of me, because her "marriage" is a fake. When I heard Tim was getting married, I was happy for Tim. I had no idea that Ann had hatcheted Tim, that Tim was dead and Teejay replaced Tim, to appease Ann and preserve my life, because truly Ann and her cartel would have caught me by surprise, for three things give them advantage: element of surprise/an unsuspecting target, disabling drugs, and cartel police backup.
ALLAH says over the years, Ann kept tabs on me, but ALLAH did not allow her to get me. From the data, it appears Ann got permission from Associate Justice Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr to murder my mother once Ann learned Capitol Hill Mafia's target was my mother. My mother was intentionally made ill and suffered months before went to the hospital for help that final time. Rutha Mae's caregivers not only handed Mae over to Ann's coven, savages, who beat, raped, taunted, screamed at and sliced her with razors, but the hospital livestreamed my mother's "doctors" removing her brain while she was conscious for profit. My mother's murder was booked as dinner entertainment for Associate Justice Samuel Alito,Jr , U.S. Navy Commander's, and other savages. They brutally murdered and ate my mother and American taxpayers paid for it all.
My Tim, ALLAH, King Jesus Christ II, is using the case of Rutha Mae Glascoe to teach humans about life after death, life before birth, clones and that ALLAH alone controls life and death. My GOD says He is going to reincarnate Rutha Mae Glascoe as Naphtali Moshe Rose.
July 20, 2023
My name is Deirdre Rose, I am ALLAH's aide and Chief Information Officer (CIO). Based on ALLAH's tweets, I have categorized the Carlee Russell Case as a whodunnit.
Police reported that on Thursday, July 13, 2023 approximately 9:34pm, Carlethia "Carlee" Nichole Russell called 911 to report seeing a toddler walking alone along Interstate Highway 459, near mile marker 11, in Hoover, Alabama. According to police, Hoover officers arrived on scene within five minutes of being dispatched, but Carlee was gone. Police allege officers found Carlee's car, cellphone, wig and purse.
Media reported that after calling 911, Carlee stopped to check on the child and called a family member. A police reported timeline indicates Carlee called the family member at 9:36pm. Police allege Carlee went missing during the conversation. In media reports, Hoover police Lt. Daniel Lowe alleged the family member lost contact with Carlee, but her "phone line remained open." Media reported Talitha Russell, Carlee's mother, told reporters that her daughter was on the phone with her sister-in-law at the time that her voice dropped out. Russell's mother then called the police and said Russell had been on the phone with a relative, and that relative had heard Russell scream. Media reported Carlee Russell returned home the night of July 15, 2023.
My initial impression, from observing Carlee's middle name, was that Carlee was in trouble. It was the first time I saw Nic[h]ole spelled with an "H". I could immediately discern Nichole was in a hole. NICHOLE is anagram of "C IN HOLE" Soundex: "SEE IN HOLE." I got the impression "HOLE" had double meaning: financially in a hole and physically in a hole. When I looked at Carlee's last name, I got the impression something happened to the whole Russell family. It seemed like the whole family responded to my inquiry, informing me they had been sold. "RUSSELL" is anagram of "R SELL US" Soundex: "ARE SELL US." "RUSSELL" is also anagram of "ELL R USS" Soundex: "EL'S ARE USS" meaning the Russell family GOD created is on a United States Ship (USS). Looking at a name is a method I use to inquire of GOD.
His Royal Highness, ALLAH, King Jesus Christ, instructed me to tip legitimate law enforcement authorities and to map/chronicle this case:
Based on the data I have decoded thus far, firstly, my hypothesis is Carlee Russell is dead, the woman posing as Carlee Russell (Carlee2) is also dead, and a third woman, also posing as Carlee Russell, Carlee3, returned to the Russell home on July 15, 2023. Secondly, my hypothesis is Carlee's parents, Talitha and Carlos Russell are dead, and the man and woman at the Russell home claiming to be Carlee's parents, Talitha and Carlos Russell are Ann Berry Rose guerilla imposters. A DNA test could be used to get pertinent information. Thirdly, my hypothesis is the police, and the boyfriend of Carlee2 -Thomar Latrell Simmons- are involved in the ruse.
The data drives my hypotheses, thus I update my hypotheses, correcting errors, as I decode clues and receive confirmation or instruction to correct from ALLAH. Hence, the fact that ALLAH has explicitly stated the data contains clues and the instruction to "SLEUTH ALL", means ALLAH wants me to perform the duties of Watson, as in Sherlock Holmes and Watson; hence the reason I've categorized the Russell case as a Whodunnit?, Howdunnit? Whydunnit? Wheredunnit? It is my job to combat mafia misdirection, by decoding and conveying ALLAH's, His Royal Highness', revelations, clues, and tips to legitimate law enforcement.
DECODING: CARLETHIA CARLEE NICHOLE RUSSELL
ANAGRAM: HRH CLUE ALL RELIES CIA TOLERANCES
ANAGRAM: HRH RESET ALIAS CLUE CONCEALER ILL
ANAGRAM: CHRONICLER HELL RESET A ALIAS CLUE
ANAGRAM: HER HELL CAROL INC RESET ALIAS CLUE
ANAGRAM: HER CALLER RESET ALIAS NICHOLL CUE
SOUNDEX: HER CALLER RESET ALIAS NICHOLE'S CUE
DECODING: TALITHA RUSSELL
ANAGRAM: STAIR SLEUTH ALL
ANAGRAM: ALTS LAIR HUSTLE
ANAGRAM: TRUTH SELL ALIAS
ANAGRAM: ASSAIL HURT ELL
ANAGRAM: ALIAS THRUST ELL
ANAGRAM: HELL ALIAS STRUT
Several days after I began decoding the Russell case, ALLAH allowed me to see a confirmation in the father's name:
DECODING: CARLOS RUSSELL
ANAGRAM: SOULS CALL ERRS
ANAGRAM: CORRAL SELLS US
DECODING: CARLOS RUSSELL
ANAGRAM: SOUL ERRS CALLS
ANAGRAM: ERR LASSO SCULL
ANAGRAM: US CORRAL SELLS
ANAGRAM: LASSO SCULL ERR
ANAGRAM: R SELL SOULS CAR
SOUNDEX: ARE SELL SOULS CAR
Here, our goal is to prove ALLAH tweets testimony from the Judgment Seat of Christ, located yonder ("yon."), and that our communication process results in educational information or actionable intelligence that is reliable. We provide a framework for P(GOD) below, but reading ALLAH's Pseudochat™ User Manual is a prequisite for understanding our method of authenticating communication with ALLAH.
We use proprietary methods and several tools working in conjunction to accomplish our goal.
1. P(GOD) is a customized probability formula that enables humans to determine the probability ALLAH is the cause of phenomena.
P(GOD) is a tool ALLAH provided to help humans quantify personal belief.
2. P(GODc) is the complement of P(GOD) and enables humans to determine the probability ALLAH is NOT the cause of phenomena.
Miracles are Zero Probability Events, that only an act of GOD can accomplish. Miracles are grouped in four categories: Secrets, Signs & Wonders, Prophecies Fulfilled, and New Wisdom.
4. Private-key Cryptography
Private-key cryptography, also called symmetric key encryption, is used to transmit and receive data and authenticate and verify Zero Probability Events. Here only one key is used to encrypt and decrypt messages.
5. Public-key Cryptography
Public-key cryptography, or asymmetric cryptography, is used to authenticate and verify symmetric key transmissions, and uses pairs of related keys.
6. Key Redundancy
We also have a proprietary process whereby ALLAH employs multiple redundant keys for various purposes (e.g. research, instruction, guidance, clarification). Please refer to ALLAH's Pseudochat™ User Manual for additional information on our cryptographic keys. The scope here is to provide a walk-through of how we process ALLAH's Interstellar Communication for cases analysis, using Carlethia Carlee Nichole Russell case data as an example.
We will demonstrate how our tools are used to authenticate, facilitate, and verify synchronous and asynchronous communication with GOD.
Our case analysis tool is comprised of this draggable toolbox, and worksheets showing our work - how we reached our conclusion.
Each reference tab in the toolbox has an associated data worksheet - tables, charts, relationship diagram, grand jury survey. Just click the "Hide Worksheet" at the top
of the worksheet or just drag the toolbox to another area of screen to view the worksheet. So let's get to work!
1) What is the probability ALLAH is the Source of Russell Case Data?
2) If ALLAH is authenticated as the Source, what is the probability our decoded data accurately represents Testimony transmitted by ALLAH from the Judgment Seat of Christ?
Scroll down. Our answer is below. We show our work on the P(GOD) Worksheet.
p(Secrets) + p(Signs) + p(Prophecy) + p(Wisdom)
Total Number of Zero Probability Events
OUR ANSWER TO P(GOD) AND P(GODc)
There is a 100% probability ALLAH is the source of Russell Case Data.
P(GOD) = (1+2+1+2) / 6 = 1
P(GODc) = 1-1 = 0
Thus, there is a 100% probability (i.e. certainty) that Russell Case decoded data accurately represents ALLAH's Testimony about Carlee Russell.
P(GOD) = (1+1+0+1) / 3 = 1
P(GODc) = 1-1 = 0
I used public key authentication to determine with certainty (100% probability) that 1) ALLAH is the source of Russell Case data and 2) the decoded data accurately represents ALLAH's Testimony about Carlee Russell because when I decoded the public key pair, ALLAH's public key: "SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF GOD" and my private key: "DEIRDRE COLETTE GLASCOE", the decoded pair corroborated the facts establised using multiple symmetric keys. Please note our public key was inexistence BEFORE Carlee's fate, it was copyrighted in year 2018 and court records verify our trademark application for our public key was filed in ~2019, years before Carlee Russell met her fate, and only GOD has foreknowledge of events.
Please refer to the probability worksheet which shows my work, and our process for error handling. The User Manual provides details on error handling.
P(GOD) FRAMEWORK FOR VERIFYING GOD IS SOURCE OF WITNESS TESTIMONY
A framework is a basic conceptual structure: a set of ideas or facts that provide support for something. Our P(GOD) framework is a synthesis of literature, beliefs, theories, hypothesis, research, and practicum applied to the problem (What is the origin of man?) that no one else has heretofore effectively solved, while reconciling science and religion.
Specifically, P(GOD) framework is a synthesis of the following: Black Swan Theory, Bayesian Probability, Is GOD A Mathematician?, A Philosophical Essay On Probabilities, Philosophical And Biblical Reference, GOD’s Word Is Mathematical And Scientific, The Bible Code Debate, Predestination Theory, GOD Is An Extraterrestrial Being, Mankind Is Artificial Intelligence, Logic Versus Perception In Testing For GOD' Existence.
BLACK SWAN THEORY
“The black swan theory or theory of black swan events is a metaphor that describes an event that comes as a surprise, has a major effect, and is often inappropriately rationalized after the fact with the benefit of hindsight. The term is based on an ancient saying which presumed black swans did not exist, but the saying was rewritten after black swans were discovered in the wild. The theory was developed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb to explain:
1. The disproportionate role of high-profile, hard-to-predict, and rare events that are beyond the realm of normal expectations in history, science, finance, and technology.
2. The non-computability of the probability of the consequential rare events using scientific methods (owing to the very nature of small probabilities).
3. The psychological biases that blind people, both individually and collectively, to uncertainty and to a rare event's massive role in historical affairs.
“The importance of the metaphor lies in its analogy to the fragility of any system of thought. A set of conclusions is
potentially undone once any of its fundamental postulates is disproved. In this case, the observation of a single black
swan would be the undoing of the logic of any system of thought, as well as any reasoning that followed from that underlying logic.”
“Unlike the earlier and broader ‘black swan problem’ in philosophy (i.e. the problem of induction), Taleb's ‘black swan theory’ refers only to unexpected events of large magnitude and consequence and their dominant role in history. Such events, considered extreme outliers, collectively play vastly larger roles than regular occurrences. More technically, in the scientific monograph 'Silent Risk', Taleb mathematically defines the black swan problem as ‘stemming from the use of degenerate meta probability.’”
Meta probability is another term for Bayesian probability. “Bayesian probability is an interpretation of the concept of probability, in which, instead of frequency or propensity of some phenomenon, probability is interpreted as reasonable expectation representing a state of knowledge or as quantification of a personal belief.
“The Bayesian interpretation of probability can be seen as an extension of propositional logic that enables reasoning with hypotheses, i.e., the propositions whose truth or falsity is uncertain. In the Bayesian view, a probability is assigned to a hypothesis, whereas under frequentist inference, a hypothesis is typically tested without being assigned a probability.
“Bayesian probability belongs to the category of evidential probabilities; to evaluate the probability of a hypothesis, the Bayesian probabilist specifies some prior probability, which is then updated to a posterior probability in the light of new, relevant data (evidence). The Bayesian interpretation provides a standard set of procedures and formulae to perform this calculation.
“The term Bayesian derives from the 18th century mathematician and theologian Thomas Bayes, who provided the first mathematical treatment of a non-trivial problem of Bayesian inference. Mathematician Pierre-Simon Laplace pioneered and popularised what is now called Bayesian probability.
“Broadly speaking, there are two views on Bayesian probability that interpret the probability concept in different ways. According to the objectivist view, probability is a reasonable expectation that represents the state of knowledge, can be interpreted as an extension of logic, and its rules can be justified by Cox's theorem. According to the subjectivist view, probability quantifies a PERSONAL BELIEF, and its rules can be justified by requirements of rationality and coherence following from the Dutch book argument or from the decision theory and de Finetti's theorem.”
IS GOD A MATHEMATICIAN?
“Is mathematics the language of nature only or is it also the language of human nature?”1 In his book Is God a Mathematician? physicist and author Mario Livio causes us to reflect on a question that has been examined by mathematicians for centuries. Can human nature be predicted with certainty?
The mathematical physicist Pierre-Simon de Laplace (1749-1827) was on the right track when in his Philosophical Essay on Probabilities he put forth the following hypothesis:
“All events, even those which on account of their insignificance do not seem to follow the great laws of nature, are a result of it just as necessary as the revolutions of the Sun. In ignorance of the ties which unite such events to the entire system of the universe, they have been made to depend upon final causes for or upon hazard … We ought then to regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its anterior state and as the cause of the one which is to follow. Given for one instant an intelligence which could comprehend all the forces by which nature is animated and the respective situations of the beings who compose it – an intelligence sufficiently vast to submit these data to analysis – it would embrace in the same formula the movements of the greatest bodies of the universe and those of the lightest atom; for it, nothing would be uncertain and the future, as the past, would be present to its eyes.” 2
In contrast Livio says:
“The twentieth century development of quantum mechanics -- the theory of the subatomic world – has proven the expectation for a fully deterministic universe to be too optimistic. Modern physics has in fact demonstrated that it is impossible to predict the outcome of every experiment, even in principle. Rather, the theory can only predict the probabilities for different results. The situation in the social sciences is clearly even more complex because of a multiplicity of interrelated elements, many of which are highly uncertain at best. The researchers of the seventeenth century realized soon enough that a search for precise universal social principles of the type of Newton’s law of gravitation was doomed from the start. For a while, it seemed that when the intricacies of human nature are brought into the equation, secure predictions become virtually impossible. The situation appeared to be even more hopeless when the minds of an entire population were involved.”
With all due respect Mr. Livio, I am going to present some evidence in this book that is going to negate the notion that a fully deterministic universe is too optimistic. I think the evidence will boil things down to a matter of perspective: prediction vs. declaration. A prediction is a forecast or prophecy. A declaration is an explicit statement, executable by one with sufficient power. Let us say for example, I am a computer programmer and I have written a program. If I am a good programmer, I do not have to predict the outcome of my program; for I already know the outcome of my program, because I am the one who declared it. I am the one who wrote every command in the source code. And that is how it is with God.
As Jim Al-Khalili said, our physical brains, are nothing more than sophisticated and hugely complicated machines that run the equivalent of computer software. All those neurons consist ultimately of atoms that obey the same laws of physics as the rest of the Universe.”
When Laplace talked about his hypothetical supreme intelligence, Laplace was not referencing God, yet, his hypothesis explains exactly how God works. So, Laplace was right when he said to his critic “This hypothesis, Sir, explains in fact everything, but does not permit to predict anything.” God knows everything because He declares everything. Mankind cannot predict anything because God does not allow us to see the future, except that which He wants us to see.
PIERRE SIMON DE LAPLACE
A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities by Pierre Simon, Marquis de LaPlace
According to Pierre Simon Laplace the most important questions in life for the most part are only problems of probability. If this is true, then the truth about God, man, coincidence and chance, should all be able to be ascertained, with some degree of accuracy, through probability.
In 1795, LaPlace wrote:
“All events, even those which on account of their insignificance do not seem to follow the great laws of nature, are a result of it just as necessarily as the revolutions of the sun. In ignorance of the ties which unite such events to the entire system of the universe, they have been made to depend on final causes or on hazard, according as they occur and are repeated with regularity, or appear without regard to order, but these imaginary causes have gradually receded with the widening bounds of knowledge and disappear entirely before sound philosophy, which sees in them only the expression of our ignorance of the true causes. “Present events are connected with preceding ones by a tie based on the evident principle that a thing cannot occur without a cause which produces it. This axiom, known by the name of the principle of sufficient reason, extends even to actions which are considered indifferent; the freest will is unable without determining motive to give them birth; if we assume two positions with exactly similar circumstances and find that the will is active in one and inactive in the other, we say that its choice is an effect without a cause. It is then, says Leibniz, the blind chance of the Epicureans. The contrary opinion is an illusion of the mind, which losing sight of the evasive reasons of the choice is determined of itself and without motives. “We ought then to regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its anterior state and the cause of the one which is to follow. Given for one instant an intelligence which could comprehend all the forces by which nature is animated and the respective situation of the beings who compose it - an intelligence sufficiently vast to submit this data to analysis - it would embrace in the same formula the movements of the greatest bodies of the universe and those of the lightest atom; for it, nothing would be uncertain and the future, as the past, would be present in its eyes. The human mind offers, in the perfection which it has been able to give to astronomy, a feeble idea of this intelligence. Its discoveries in mechanics and geometry, added to that of universal gravity, have enabled it to comprehend in the same analytic expressions the past and future states of the system of the world. Applying the same method to some other objects of its knowledge, it has succeeded in referring to general laws observed phenomena and in foreseeing those which given circumstances ought to produce. All these efforts in the search for truth tend to lead it back continually to the vast intelligence which we have just mentioned, but from which it will always remain infinitely removed. This tendency, peculiar to the human race, is that which renders it superior to animals; and their progress in this respect distinguishes nations and ages and constitutes their true glory.
“Let us recall that formerly, and at no great epoch, an unusual rain or an extreme drought, a comet having in train a very long tail, the eclipses, the aurora borealis, and in general all the unusual phenomena, were regarded as so many signs of celestial wrath. Heaven was invoked in order to avert their baneful influence. No one prayed to have the planets and the sun arrested in their courses; observations had soon made apparent the futility of such prayers. But as these phenomena, occurring and disappearing at long intervals, seemed to oppose the order of nature, it was supposed that Heaven, irritated by the crimes of the earth, had created them to announce its vengeance. Thus the long tail of the comet of 1456 spread terror through Europe, already thrown into consternation by the rapid successes of the Turks, who had just overthrown the Lower Empire. This star after four revolutions has excited among us a very different interest. The knowledge of the laws of the system of the world acquired in the interval had dissipated the fears begotten by the ignorance of the true relationship of man to the universe; and Halley, having recognised the identity of this comet with those of the years 1531, 1607, and 1682, announced its next return for the end of the year 1758 or the beginning of the year 1759. The learned world awaited with impatience this return which was to confirm one of the greatest discoveries that have been made in the sciences, and fulfil the prediction of Seneca when he said, when speaking of the revolutions of those stars which fall from an enormous height: "The day will come when, by study pursued through several ages, the things now concealed will appear with evidence; and posterity will be astonished that truths so clear had escaped us". Clairaut then undertook to submit to analysis the perturbations which the comet had experienced by the action of the two great planets, Jupiter and Saturn; after immense calculations he fixed its next passage at the perihelion towards the beginning of April 1759, which was actually verified by observation. The regularity which astronomy shows us in the movements of the comets doubtless exists also in all phenomena.”
We are again at a point in time where things once concealed will appear with evidence; and posterity will be astonished that truths so clear had escaped us. This information does not come as a result of study pursued by man, the information in this book was revealed to me by God. On my own this work would not have been possible. [footnote: A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities by Pierre Simon, Marquis de LaPlace, Translated from the Sixth French Edition by Frederick Wilson Truscott, PhD and Frederick Lincoln Emery M.E.; First Edition, New York: John Wiley and Sons; London: Chapman and Hall Limited, 1902.]
PHILOSOPHICAL AND BIBLICAL REFERENCE
Let us imagine for a moment that there is a God, and He is the Supreme Intelligence of whom Mathematician Pierre Simon LaPlace unwittingly hypothesized when he wrote:
“Given for one instant an intelligence which could comprehend all the forces by which nature is animated and the respective situation of the beings who compose it - an intelligence sufficiently vast to submit this data to analysis - it would embrace in the same formula the movements of the greatest bodies of the universe and those of the lightest atom; for it, nothing would be uncertain and the future, as the past, would be present in its eyes.” A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities by Pierre Simon, Marquis de LaPlace 
Now what if this all-knowing God knew, for certain, what was going to occur in the future because He was the One who declared it in the past, like a computer programmer declares a variable at the start of a program? Is this not essentially what the Bible tells us?
“Remember the former things of old, For I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like Me, Declaring the end from the beginning, And from ancient times things that are not yet done, Saying, ‘My counsel shall stand, And I will do all My pleasure,’ Calling a bird of prey from the east, The man who executes My counsel, from a far country. Indeed I have spoken it; I will also bring it to pass. I have purposed it; I will also do it” – Holy Bible, Isaiah 46:9-11
What if God, in this manner, created all mankind, simply declaring for each person - their characteristics and their ways - and what their purpose would be?
“Whatever one is, he has been named already, for it is known that he is man; and he cannot contend with Him who is mightier than he.” – Ecclesiastes 6:10
“And you, my child, will be called a prophet of the Most High; for you will go on before the Lord to prepare the way for him” – Luke 1:76 (NIV)
Let us assume for a moment, that what the Bible says is true, that God is our Creator, that He declares the end from the beginning, and that He writes our fate in our name. If God can declare what each person will be, in this manner, then what does that make us?
MANKIND IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
In his book Paradox: The Nine Greatest Enigmas in Physics (2012), author Jim Al-Khalili likens humans to machines. He says “Our physical brains, each consisting of a network of a hundred billion or so neurons linked together via hundreds of trillions of synaptic connections, are, according to everything we know about them so far, nothing more than sophisticated and hugely complicated machines that run the equivalent of computer software, albeit involving a complexity and interconnectedness far beyond anything a modern computer can achieve. All those neurons consist ultimately of atoms that obey the same laws of physics as the rest of the Universe.”
GOD’S WORD IS MATHEMATICAL AND SCIENTIFIC
Galileo is reported to have said ‘the book of nature was written in the language of mathematics, not in biblical verse.1” Galileo’s error was in assuming that biblical verse is not mathematical. I’m going to answer Livio’s question – Is God a mathematician and correct Galileo by demonstrating in this book, that God’s word is indeed mathematical and scientific. I shall use Boolean Algebra to demonstrate the mathematical properties of God’s word. Though, as we delve in this Book, you shall see other examples of its mathematical properties.
My demonstration starts with a simple process. I declare two variables x and y and assign values to them. I then compare the values of the variables to see if their values are equivalent. If their values are equivalent, the result yields a truth value; if their values are not equivalent, the result yields a false value. This is the objective test I use to determine if God’s word proves true, or if the word I am testing is a corrupted version God’s word ( i.e. a lie masquerading as truth). Using this method, I can test many things: spirits, today religious teachings, the work of the Apostles; anything that tries to establish its source as God, I can objectively tested using Boolean Algebra. Let me walk you through the process2: First, I test the Word of God to see if it is true. Since the bulk of this book is going to involve testing the Word of God to see if His word is true, let us, for example sake, assume the truth of Proverbs 30:5; which says, “Every word of God proves true.3”
If every word of God proves true, then we can trust that He will provide a mechanism for us to confirm His word and His authorship. So, if we have already proven God’s Word is true, these are the steps I follow to determine, if the spirit behind whatever it is I am dealing with is from God:
I start with the literal text of the Bible – separating out that portion of scripture which only the Father or the Son spoke directly or through the Father’s prophets. The works of Jesus’ disciples are not taken at face value to be true, rather I test even the work of the disciples against that which the Father or the Son said. So, to be clear, the only work I presume to be true in the Bible are the words spoken by God the Father Himself (including through His prophets) or the words spoken directly by His Son – Jesus Christ. The reason, I only take what the Father or the Son says to be true is because both the Father and the Son said that we can trust no one, not even our religious leaders. The Father said explicitly that there are some lies written in the Bible: "'How can you say, "We are wise because we have the word of the LORD," when your teachers have twisted it by writing lies?4” “… for everyone from the least even to the greatest is given to covetousness; from the prophet even to the priest everyone deals falsely.”5
Jesus also cautioned us with respect to those who teach us. “Jesus said to them, “Watch and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” – Matthew 16:6
"What sorrow awaits you teachers of religious law and you Pharisees. Hypocrites! For you cross land and sea to make one convert, and then you turn that person into twice the child of hell you yourselves are!” – Matthew 23:15 (NLT)
So knowing that I cannot even trust what religious leaders of today say, I then go about testing the works that is the subject of my inquiry. I test everything written in the Bible, by comparing it against what Jesus and His Father said, knowing that the Lord does not allow His own words to be corrupted. Following is an example of my methodology in play.
Using Psalms 119:160 and Provers 30:5, I shall demonstrate the scientific and mathematical nature of God’s Word:
"The sum of your word is truth, and every one of your righteous rules endures forever." - Psalm 119:160 (ESV)
"Every word of God proves true. He defends all who come to him for protection." - Proverbs 30:5 (TLB)
According to Proverbs 30:5, if x = Psalm 119:160 then x = True.
According to Psalm 119:160, if x = Proverbs 30:5 then x = True.
Let us expand the example:
"If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater, for this is the testimony of God that he has borne concerning his Son." - 1 John 5:9
According to Proverbs 30:5, if x = 1 John 5:9 then x = True
Let us expand even more:
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.” – Matthew 5:17-18
According to Proverbs 30:5, if x = Matthew 5:17-18, then x = True.
So, if we were to compare all scripture to what Jesus and His Father said, we would know what is true and what is false because God the Father said:
“Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the LORD your God that I give you.” – Deuteronomy 4:2 (NIV)
So pretty much anything that deviates from what God the Father or God the Son said is a falsehood, this includes any work of the disciples – which is why the work of the disciples is also tested, and not automatically taken at face value. So, let us look at a different type of example.
The Catholic Church and many denominations are built on the teachings of the man who called himself Apostle Paul. In the beginning of my training with God, the Holy Spirit asked me, “Can we trust the work of Paul?” So, I began to test the work of Paul, and what I found was that some of Paul’s teachings – that is still being taught by religious leaders today - outright contradict what the Father YAHWEH and His Son Jesus Christ said. Other of Paul’s teachings contained a mixture of truth and lie. This too was tested using Boolean algebra. In Boolean algebra, if a variable whose value is FALSE is ‘ANDED’ with a variable whose value is TRUE, the result is FALSE. In other words, it does not matter how much truth you mix with lie, the output of the entire statement will always be a lie. Let us walk through this concept using another example:
In this example, ‘x’ represents what Jesus says, ‘y’ represents what Paul says.
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.” – Matthew 5:17-18
“For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes." – Romans 10:4(ESV)
You do not have to be a mathematician to see that what Jesus says in Matthew 5:17-18 and what Paul says in Romans 10:4 do not equal. So does the Lord’s law stand, or does it not? The method taught to me by Jesus, allows me to come to an objective conclusion; one that is not constrained by centuries of lies that have already been told.
In Romans 10:4 Paul says “Christ is the end of the law” but in Matthew 5:17-18 Jesus says “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law… heaven and earth [will] disappear before ..the smallest letter, … the least stroke of a pen, will disappear from the Law ….” – Matthew 5:17-18
From our first examples, we can assign ‘x’ to represent Matthew 5:17-18;
x = True because it is what Jesus said.
If ‘y’ represents Romans 10:4 (What Paul said) then y = False because ‘x’ does not equal ‘y’ or x != y.
The nice thing about this test, is that we have another way to confirm it; simply look out of the window. If we look out of the window and see earth or heaven still present, then we know that God’s law is still present, because Jesus said earth and heaven will disappear before even the smallest portion of the law disappears. So, the disappearance of earth and heaven are our leading indicators. If the first thing has not happened (earth’s disappearance), then the second thing, the dependent thing, (God’s law) has not happened either.
If Paul had been speaking the truth then what Paul said would equal (=) what Jesus said, because according to Deuteronomy 4:2, Paul has no authority to add to or take away from God’s word. If Paul had any authority, it was the authority to say exactly what Jesus compelled him to say. Just as Jesus never spoke beyond what the Father compelled Jesus to say. Jesus was very clear on this, He said: “I don’t speak on my own authority. The Father who sent me has commanded me what to say and how to say it. 50 And I know his commands lead to eternal life; so I say whatever the Father tells me to say.” John 12:49-50 (NLT)
Through this demonstration was brief, we can see that the Word of God is indeed mathematical. It is also scientific. We can evaluate the Word of God using mathematical symbols and operators and we can repeat this demonstration with any alleged scripture, and the result will be consistent, thus making the process of testing God’s Word scientific. Thus, Galileo’s implication that Bible verse is not mathematical is incorrect. God’s Word is both Mathematical and Scientific.
THE BIBLE CODE DEBATE
In 1981 Rashad Khalifa, an Egyptian-American biochemist discovered a mathematical structure, based on the number 19, hidden in the Qur’an. In 1994, three Israelis1 put forth the assertion that hidden codes existed in the Book of Genesis and that these codes referred to modern-day individuals, Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis, Doron Witztum, Eliyahu Rips and Yoav Rosenberg, Statistical Science, Vol. 9 (1994) 429-438. In 1997, an American journalist named Michael Drosnin, expanding upon the theory of Equidistant Letter Sequences (ELS) with his own research, published separately, a book entitled Bible Code wherein Drosnin asserted that there are codes hidden in the Bible which can be interpreted with the help of a computer program. According to Drosnin, the “Bible Code” could predict the future.
Because they did not believe it possible for the Bible to make reference to modern-day individuals, when Statistical Science published Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis, they published it as though it were a puzzle and challenged their readers to solve it. Mathematician and scientist Brendan Mckay, along with a few of his colleagues, responded to the challenge.
In their paper Solving the Bible Code Puzzle,2 Brendan Mckay, Dror Bar-Natan, Maya Bar-Hillel, and Gil Kalai argued against the probability of codes being hidden in the Book of Genesis by demonstrating that hidden “codes” could be found in any text of substantial length. The question that Brendan Mckay, et al, attempted to answer, was whether the Book of Genesis contained letter arrays that constitute thematically or contextually related words in compact formations more often than expected by chance.19 Chance being defined as the occurrence and development of events in the absence of any obvious design. In 1997 Brendan Mckay could be seen taking a victory lap around the internet,3 and approximately 55 mathematicians signed a petition, also posted on the internet, basically declaring McKay the debate winner. The petition was entitled Mathematicians’ Statement on Bible Code; which rebutted, in toto, theory on Bible Code. Though not explicitly stated, the existence of God was at the heart of the Bible Code debate.
RECAPITULATION OF THE MATHEMATICIANS’ DEBATE
Fifty-five (55) Mathematicians from prominent universities around the world signed their name to the following statement which was posted on the internet:
“We are making this statement concerning what have been called ‘Bible codes’ or ‘Torah codes’. We recognize that many sincere people take this phenomenon seriously, which compels us to speak out on the basis of what our mathematical training tells us about the evidence claimed for this alleged phenomenon.
“There is a common belief in the general community to the effect that many mathematicians, statisticians, and other scientists consider the claims to be credible. This belief is incorrect. On the contrary, the almost unanimous opinion of those in the scientific world who have studied the question is that the theory is without foundation. The signatories to this letter have themselves examined the evidence and found it entirely unconvincing.
“We refer in particular to the paper Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis, published in Statistical Science in 1994. This experiment suffers from major problems concerning both its execution and the interpretation of its conclusions. Even without these concerns, we would not take such extraordinary claims seriously without a vastly more systematic and thorough investigation. No such investigation has been carried out, nor has the work so far established a prima facie case. In addition, word clusters such as mentioned in Witztum's and Drosnin's books and the so called messianic codes are an uncontrolled phenomenon and similar clusters will be found in any text of similar length. All claims of incredible probabilities for such clusters are bogus, since they are computed contrary to standard rules of probability and statistics. Among the signatories below are some who believe that the Torah was divinely written. We see no conflict between that belief and the opinion we have expressed above.5”
According to Internet sources, “In 1994 Doron Witztum, Eliyahu Rips, and Yoav Rosenberg published an article in the journal Statistical Science. It was entitled Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis. This article describes an experiment which seems to show a remarkable proximity between names of rabbis and their dates of birth or death in the Book of Genesis. These names and dates occur as sequences of letters in the text which are the same distance apart. As an example of an Equidistant Letter Sequence (or, more briefly, an ELS), it was noticed several decades ago by Rabbi Weissmandel that the word Torah occurs spelled out as T, O, R, H (in their Hebrew equivalents) in the Book of Genesis by starting from the first T. The 50th letter after that T is an O. The 50th letter after the O is an R. And the 50th letter after the R is H. In this example, the "skip length" is 50 letters. It turns out that TORH is spelled out more than 56,000 times in the Book of Genesis (with various skip lengths). Genesis itself is slightly more than 78,000 letters long.
The editor of Statistical Science, Professor Robert Kass, made the following remark about the article by Witztum, Rips, Rosenberg in his preface to that issue of the journal: ". . . When the authors used a randomization test to see how rarely the pattern they found might arise by chance alone they obtained a very highly significant result, with p=0.000016. Our referees were baffled: their prior beliefs made them think the Book of Genesis could not possibly contain meaningful references to modern-day individuals, yet when the authors carried out additional analyses and checks the effect persisted. The paper is thus offered to Statistical Science readers as a challenging puzzle."
After the publication in Statistical Science in 1994, an American journalist named Michael Drosnin, drawing upon ELS and his own research published, separately, a book entitled Bible Code.
According to Internet Sources “Drosnin began researching the Bible Code in 1992 after meeting the mathematician Eliyahu Rips in Israel. In 1997 Drosnin published the Bible Code, which asserts that the Bible Code predicts the future and that events can be affected by our actions. The book also states that many famous assassinations—both past and future—were foretold in the Bible, and that the code can be interpreted with the help of a computer program.”
“Based on the results of independent experiments conducted on the Book of Genesis and control experiments conducted on Moby Dick, War and Peace, and Drosdin’s book itself,”23 the 55 mathematicians signed the statement rebutting the existence of Bible Code, stating that the theory lacked foundation.
According to another internet source “The control experiments which several people performed show rather clearly the silliness of Drosnin's approach. In Drosnin's book itself, Dave Thomas found the following message encoded as ELS's: ‘The code is a silly snake-oil hoax.’"
In a public statement Dr. Eliyahu Rips, Professor of Mathematics Hebrew University Jerusalem, Israel said “The only conclusion that can be drawn from the scientific research regarding the Torah codes is that they exist and that they are not a mere coincidence.”
In August 2017, I distributed a working paper entitled Predestination Theory,10 to rebut the Mathematicians’ Statement on Bible code.
In the paper I used the scientific method to restate what the Bible tells us about predestination. I also provided an example or predestination using 5 modern day individuals unrelated to me, and an individual whose life was written about in the Bible. Below is an excerpt from my paper. The paper was distributed in 5 electronic journals on the Social Science Research Network. This book contains empirical evidence which augments the evidence provided in my paper on Predestination Theory.
Predestination Theory is the theory that everything that will happen has already been decided by God and cannot be changed. The source of this theory is the Bible:
Whatever has happened was foreordained, and what happens to a person was also foreknown. It is useless for him to argue with God about his fate because God is more powerful than he is. – Ecclesiastes 6:10 (NET Bible)
“Everything has already been decided. It was known long ago what each person would be. So there's no use arguing with God about your destiny.” –Ecclesiastes 6:10 (NLT)
Another aspect of this theory is that events also, not just people’s destiny are foreknown, this aspect of predestination theory implies that time is cyclical.
There is an appointed time for everything. And there is a time for every event under heaven— Ecclesiastes 3:1 (NASB)
“Whatever is, has already been, and whatever will be, already is. God repeats what has passed.” – Ecclesiastes 3:14-15 (HCSB)
“History merely repeats itself. It has all been done before. Nothing under the sun is truly new. Sometimes people say, ‘Here is something new!’ But actually it is old; nothing is ever truly new. We don’t remember what happened in the past, and in future generations, no one will remember what we are doing now.” – Ecclesiastes 1:9-11 (NLT)
"For behold, I create new heavens and a new earth; And the former shall not be remembered or come to mind.” Isaiah 65:17
And another aspect of the theory is that a person’s destiny is written in their name.
“Whatever exists has already been named, and what humanity is has been known; no one can contend with someone who is stronger.” – Ecclesiastes 6:10 (NIV)
“Whatever has come to be has already been named, and it is known what man is, and that he is not able to dispute with one stronger than he.” – Ecclesiastes 6:10 (ESV)
I found patterns in names, both biblical and modern-day, that led me to believe that predestination theory could be tested simply by deciphering the hidden code in a person’s name. After the Lord taught me how to decipher The Lord’s Cipher ™ I was inspired to test Predestination Theory. In this book, I test; first using a biblical example, then applying the test to modern-day individuals, then I apply the test to myself. Here is the Biblical example:
“Now Pashhur the son of Immer, the priest who was also chief governor in the house of the Lord, heard that Jeremiah prophesied these things. Then Pashhur struck Jeremiah the prophet, and put him in the stocks that were in the high gate of Benjamin, which was by the house of the Lord. And it happened on the next day that Pashhur brought Jeremiah out of the stocks. Then Jeremiah said to him, “The Lord has not called your name Pashhur, but Magor-Missabib.[a] For thus says the Lord: ‘Behold, I will make you a terror to yourself and to all your friends; and they shall fall by the sword of their enemies, and your eyes shall see it. I will give all Judah into the hand of the king of Babylon, and he shall carry them captive to Babylon and slay them with the sword. Moreover I will deliver all the wealth of this city, all its produce, and all its precious things; all the treasures of the kings of Judah I will give into the hand of their enemies, who will plunder them, seize them, and carry them to Babylon. And you, Pashhur, and all who dwell in your house, shall go into captivity. You shall go to Babylon, and there you shall die, and be buried there, you and all your friends, to whom you have prophesied lies.’” – Jeremiah 20:1-6 (NKJV) (Footnote [a]: Jeremiah 20:3 Literally Fear on Every Side (NKJV))
In the example above, when God changed Pashhur’s name to Magor-Missabib, not only did God change the fate of Pashhur, but God also changed the fate of all of Pashhur’s friends as well, and anyone remotely connected to Pashhur. Upon examination of his new name, Magor-Missabib, it is clear why Pashhur would become a terror to all his friends.
Magor-Missabib is an anagram for “Is Grim as a Bomb.” Grim is something so unpleasant that you don’t want to be around it. Bomb is a device that wreaks havoc and destruction on those who encounter it. Any bomb will literally cause fear on every side.
An interesting thing to note, is that the use of bombs did not begin until the 11th century in Song Dynasty China, which means that when God renamed Pashhur “Is Grim as a Bomb,” nobody but God, even knew what a bomb was, for bombs were not yet discovered in Pashhur’s time.
For a modern-day example, I shall use Brian Scholl, since you have already been introduced to his work. Brian Scholl is “a Professor in the Department of Psychology, Chair of the Cognitive Science Program, and director of the Perception and Cognition Laboratory, at Yale University. [His] lab explores how we see and how we think, with a special focus on how perception interacts with other aspects of our minds.”12
In other words, Brian Scholl operates a ‘Brain School,’ because he was predestined to do so. I confirmed this by deciphering Brian Scholl’s name.
“Brian” is an anagram for “Brain.” “Scholl” is a homophone for “School.”
You might think that is too easy, so let us look at another example - Seth Shostak.
Seth Shostak is a Senior Astronomer at the SETI Institute and the host of the Institute’s Big Picture Science Radio Show.13 Seth Shostak was predestined to be the talk show host at SETI.
Seth - ‘ETH” is an anagram for "the"
Shostak –‘TAK’ is a soundex for "talk"
Shostak - “SHO” is a soundex for "show"
Shostak - ‘HOST’ is a literal word in the name Shostak "host"
Seth Shostak deciphered means “The talk show host,” and that is exactly what he is at SETI.
If you separate the ‘SET’ from the ‘H’ in Seth’s name and state the word “Set” and pronounce the sound ‘H’ as a separate syllable, you will be saying the word SETI, which is the acronym for “Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence.” SET + H
Do not think that I have chosen these two modern-day individual examples at random, for I have not. God gave me their names, so that I could look at their work, to help me test hypotheses I formed after my close encounter with God.
1) Human Beings are intelligent robots (artificial intelligence).
2) God is an extraterrestrial Being
GOD IS AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL BEING
Is there life on other planets? Is there other life? While scientists spend millions and billions of dollars grappling with the first question, I have been given, freely, by my God, the answer to the second. Yes, there is other life. It does not exist on another planet, it exists in another world; world being defined as dimension.
Jesus Christ was clear, He is not from our world; but who had the wherewithal to understand what Jesus was saying 2000 years ago? Who has the wherewithal to understand it now? Certainly not the ones who have been spending millions and billions of dollars on it. Given that the information has been sitting in plain sight in the Bible for free for centuries.
“Jesus said to them, “You’re from below. I’m from above. You’re from this world. I’m not from this world.” – John 8:23(GW)
Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.” – John 18:36 (ESV)
And what can be said of Isaiah 28:21 or 1st Corinthians, chapter 15?
“For the LORD shall rise up as on mount Perazim, he shall be angry as in the valley of Gibeon, that he may do his work, his awesome work; and bring to pass his act, his alien act.” - Isaiah 28:21
“All flesh is not the same flesh, but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of animals, another of fish, and another of birds. There are also celestial bodies and terrestrial bodies; but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another. There is one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for one star differs from another star in glory.” – 1 Corinthians 13:39-41
So, what is God exactly? God is a psychological being, not part of the material world. He was not created, nor can He be destroyed. God defines Himself as self-existing Supreme Genius Mind.
God has the ability to take on the form of whatever He chooses and He can participate in the material world whenever He likes; though He is and can do so much more. So since God is not part of the material world, by definition He is an extraterrestrial. Extraterrestrial refers to any object or being beyond (extra) the planet Earth (terrestrial).
God is our Maker. Human beings are intelligent robots. Each and every one of us are predestined. Once I understood that humans were predestined, and some kind of intelligent robot, I asked God the next logical question, “If we are robots, how is it that we can have children?”
God replied, “You are robots that can multiply.” I discerned that a pun was intended.
After this, I was standing in front of a mirror, contemplating all that the Lord had said. As I stood in front of the mirror, I did a 1970’s style robot dance to amuse myself, and I could not help but chuckle. Here mankind was thinking he is the superior being in the universe, but come to find out we are nothing more than robots. Another question popped into my head, so I asked God.
If we are created beings – robots - some form of artificial intelligence, then where does evolution fit in? This time the answer I received was an impression: How about at the end, and not the beginning?
LOGIC VERSUS PERCEPTION IN TESTING FOR GOD’S EXISTENCE
The reason some people think that God does not exist is simply because they cannot perceive Him. But, what if, as Al-Khalili alludes, mankind is some form of artificial intelligence? What if God programmed into some of us the ability to perceive God, while others of us have not been given that ability? If that is true, then a perception-based test of God’s existence, would never yield accurate results because those with the inability to perceive God would always conclude that God does not exist because they cannot perceive Him. It would be the same as if we all conclude that atoms do not exist because we cannot distinguish them with our naked eye. The work of Brian Scholl, informs us of human perception deficits. 
Brian Scholl is Professor of Psychology and Chair of the Cognitive Science Program at Yale University. Through Professor Scholl and his colleagues, we have learned that humans have deficits in perception; inattentional blindness is an example. “Inattentional blindness, also known as perceptual blindness, is a psychological lack of attention that is not associated with any vision defects or deficits. It may be further defined as the event in which an individual fails to recognize an unexpected stimulus that is in plain sight.6” According to Scholl, “perhaps the most striking phenomenon of visual awareness is inattentional blindness (IB), in which a surprisingly salient event right in front of you may go completely unseen when unattended. ” 
It is the work of Brian Scholl and a television series called “Brain Games,” that provide the scientific basis which support my theory that human beings are in fact intelligent robots whose intelligence is artificial and whose perception is limited, and therefore human perception cannot be used as a scientific tool to determine God’s existence. Brain Games  demonstrates limitations of human cognition which are so severe, that we cannot possibly rely solely on human perception to determine whether God exists. Brain Games is a popular science television series that explores cognitive science by focusing on illusions, psychological experiments, and counterintuitive thinking.
Logic, unlike perception, is scientific. Logic is “a science that deals with the principles and criteria of validity of inference and demonstration”9 An example of logic is this: if it can be proven with certainty that a person speaks, and proven with certainty that what the person has spoken is true, then it goes to follow, that the person who speaks exists, and we do not rely on human perception to know that the person exists because human perception is faulty. We rely on logic to know that the person exists, because before speech can prove true, it has to be spoken, and in order for speech to be spoken, there must exist a speaker. I shall prove God’s existence, therefore, not by perception but by logic and mathematical probabilities, which is far more effective and reliable than human perception. The only tools I need to accomplish this is GOD’s cooperation and Bible code.
America has a national security problem: law makers and law enforcers are lawbreakers. People holding positions of public trust are law breakers. Many public officials not breaking the law explicitly are shirking their duty to uphold and defend the United States Constitution.
America is a lawless nation. Freeloading migrants are flooding the country in droves hoping for an opportunity to murder an American citizen, and assume their identity, and help overthrow America using Jujitsu and honed Nazi technique, which Capitol Hill Mafia Law allows.
The United States Judiciary is being used as a tool to enslave and murder negroes for profit. People occupying positions traditionally trusted are behind the scam: U.S. Presidents, Supreme Court Justices, Senators, Congresspeople, Heads of Federal Agencies, District Attorneys, Police Chiefs and Sheriffs around the country are all engaged in enslavement of humans and murder for profit.
ALLAH is here to defend His people and aid justice on earth. ALLAH has provided technology for improved forensics and crime prevention and ALLAH has placed America under deuteronomy law which means if you commit a crime against ALLAH's people, you will have to answer directly to GOD; where in COURT OF GOD there is equal opportunity for everyone to receive ALLAH's death penalty, men, women and children; citizen, resident, illegal alien; gay, straight, transgender ALL have equal opportunity to receive ALLAH's death penalty, as well as a wide range of penalties, that may make death preferable.
Judgment on Israel
"I saw a vision of the Lord standing by the temple altar, and he said, 'Shake the columns until the tops fall loose, and the doorposts crumble. Then make the pieces fall on the people below. I will take a sword and kill anyone who escapes.
'If they dig deep into the earth or climb to the sky, I'll reach out and get them. If they escape to the peaks of Mount Carmel, I'll search and find them. And if they hide from me at the bottom of the ocean, I'll command a sea monster to bite them. I'll send a sword to kill them, wherever their enemies drag them off as captives. I'm determined to hurt them, not to help them.' His Name Is the Lord
"When the Lord God All-Powerful touches the earth, it melts, and its people mourn. God makes the earth rise and then fall, just like the Nile River. He built his palace in the heavens and let its foundations rest on the earth. He scoops up the ocean and empties it on the earth. His name is the Lord. The Lord Is God
"Israel, I am the Lord God, and the Ethiopians are no less important to me than you are. I brought you out of Egypt, but I also brought the Philistines from Crete and the Arameans from Kir. My eyes have seen what a sinful nation you are, and I'll wipe you out. But I will leave a few of Jacob's descendants. I, the Lord, have spoken! At my command, all of you will be sifted like grain. Israelites who remain faithful will be scattered among the nations. And the others will be trapped like trash in a sifter. Some of you are evil, and you deny that you will ever get caught. But you will be killed." (Holy Bible, Amos 9:1-10 CEV)
So it does NOT matter who you are, Attorney General, Supreme Court Justice, U.S. Navy, President of United States or leader of ANY nation; if you perpetrate a crime against GOD'S people
you are going to be charged in the COURT OF GOD. In COURT OF GOD arraignment and death are synonymous. When ALLAH issues an arrest warrant, the perpetrator goes into cardiac arrest.
Probable cause is established upon the WORD OF GOD.
"For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart." (Holy Bible. Hebrews 4:12 NIV)
Null Hypothesis Testing and Bayesian Probability are used to authenticate, validate and verify that the word under consideration is GOD's, or has been transmitted by GOD from the Judgment Seat of Christ.
We use a null hypothesis test to rebut presumptions of innocence. Presumption of innocence is a legal principle wherein a suspect or defendant is assumed to be innocent of commiting a crime (null is not rejected) until proven guilty (null is rejected) beyond a reasonable doubt (to a statistically significant degree).”
Thus, if we are able to rebut the presumption of innocence with a null hypothesis test, then we conclude probable cause requirement has been met.
According to Legal Information Institute (LII), "Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant. Although the Fourth Amendment states that 'no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause', it does not specify what 'probable cause' actually means. "Legal Information Institute.
"The Supreme Court has attempted to clarify the meaning of the term on several occasions, while recognizing that probable cause is a concept that is imprecise, fluid and very dependent on context. In Illinois v. Gates, the Court favored a flexible approach, viewing probable cause as a 'practical, non-technical' standard that calls upon the 'factual and practical considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent men [...] act'". Legal Information Institute
Under Eve's Lens™ Pry™ Method for establishing probable cause, probable cause is established when probable cause criteria are met:
a) As to probable cause to open an investigation: ALLAH transmits a "WHODUNNIT?", "CHARACTERIZE" or "RATE" message; OR in a null hypothesis test, alpha is greater than 'p'; OR via our reasonable man assessment the probability a crime has occured is greater than 25%.
b) As to probable cause for search and seizure: ALLAH's transmits instructions indicating search or seizure (e.g. "Search," "Exhume," "Go to location," "Test Blood " "Test DNA ") OR in a null hypothesis test, alpha is greater than 'p'; OR a jury concludes via P(GOD) Survey™ that the probability evidence of a crime is located on the subject or at the property of the subject is greater than or equal to 47% probability.
c) As to probable cause for arrest: ALLAH's transmits a "JAIL," "ARREST!," "APPREHEND," "SUBDUE" message OR in a null hypothesis test, alpha is greater than 'p'; OR a jury concludes via P(GOD) Survey™ that there is greater than 50% probability a person or organization has comitted a crime. For example:
DECODING: MAJ. GILBERTO DE LEON
ANAGRAM: T JAIL EEL MEN ROB GOD
SOUNDEX: TEE, “JAIL! EEL MEN ROB GOD.”
On or about January 26, 2023, I received a notification in response to a question I post on twitter days earlier: “DID YOU KNOW HUMAN LIVES ARE NARRATED BY ALLAH?
A twitter user, Carol@carann08, replied:
"where do people get this stuff from too much free time."
ALLAH said "Carol is Ann." ALLAH tweeted a response to Ann encoded in an encryption key representation of "Carol@carann08" which is "CAROL AT CARANN ZERO EIGHT." The LORD instructed me to use the key to characterize Ann Berry Rose's Mob Organization.
The worksheet contains my progress thus far.